New Report – Variation in Tract-Level Self-Response Rates in the 2020 U.S. Census

Georgetown’s Center on Poverty and Inequality released a report written by Dr. William O’Hare and Jae June J. Lee that provides a preliminary assessment of the accuracy of the 2020 Census. The authors used tract level self-response rates as an indicator to estimate which groups or geographic areas were missed and undercounted.

Areas with a concentration of historically undercounted groups had a lower self-response rate, which indicates a higher net undercount and omissions rate in these same areas. The report specifies the groups as census tracts with a concentration of Black people, Hispanic people, American Indian and Alaskan Native people, foreign-born people, people with low incomes, people with educational attainment of a high school diploma or less, people who are renters, people who have recently moved, or people who live in crowded housing.  While this report cannot estimate how many people included their young children, since young children are more likely to be missed if they belong to these historically undercounted groups, it suggests that young children may also have been missed at high rates.

Self-response trends from the most recent census were similar to those in the 1990, 2000, and 2010 Censuses. The report concludes with three recommendations to improve the mandate to count everyone once, only once, and in the right place.

Found this article helpful? Share it!

More resources like this

Recommendations to the Census Bureau for Improving the Count of Young Children in 2030

The 2030 Census Advisory Committee was scheduled to meet April 3 and 4. It had

Comments on Preserving State and Local Child Poverty Data

The Coalition on Human Needs, Partnership for America’s Children, and Zero to Three had planned

End of Census Advisory Committees Will Make Counting Kids Harder

On February 28, the Census Bureau advised members of the Census Scientific Advisory Committee, the